Whereas, the State recognizes that an effective intellectual and industrial property system is vital to the development of domestic creativity, facilitates transfer of technology, attracts foreign investments and ensures market access for our products;

 

Whereas, the State recognizes that the use of intellectual property bears a social function and to this end, the State shall promote the diffusion of knowledge and information for the promotion of national development and progress and the common good; 

Whereas, it is the policy of the State to enhance the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the country and to protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists and other gifted citizens to their intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people; 

Whereas, it is the policy of the State to enhance the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the Philippines; 

Now, therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Republic Act No. 8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, the following rules and regulations on administrative complaints for violation of laws involving intellectual property rights are hereby promulgated : 

RULE 1

DEFINITIONS, INTERPRETATION; RULES OF COURT 

Section 1.          Definition of Terms – Unless otherwise indicated, the following terms shall be understood as follows:

 

(a)              “Answer “  means a pleading in which the adverse party sets forth the negative and affirmative defenses upon which he relies;

 

 

(b)         “Bonds” and “Counterbonds”  shall refer to cash bonds and cash counterbonds in the form of cash, cashiers check or manager’s check, excluding surety bonds and surety counterbonds;

 

(c)          “Bureau” means the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the Intellectual Property Office;

 

(d)          “Chief Hearing Officer” means the officer within the Bureau who exercises immediate supervision over any Hearing Officer.  His title or official designation may differ from the words “Chief Hearing Officer” depending on the structure of the Office;

 

(e)          “Complaint” means a concise statement of the ultimate facts constituting the complainant’s cause or causes of action.  It shall specify the relief sought, but it may add a general prayer for such further or other relief as may be just and equitable;

 

(f)          “Court” means a court of general jurisdiction such as Regional Trial Court;

 

(g)          “Director General” means the head of the Intellectual Property Office;

 

(h)          “Director” means the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs;

 

(i)          “False Designation of Origin” means the act of any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which:  (i) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person; or  (ii) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services or commercial activities, shall be liable to a civil action for damages and injunction provided in Sections 156 and 157 of the IP Code by any person who believes that he or she is likely to be damaged by such act. 

 

(j)          “False or Fraudulent Declaration” means the act of any person who shall procure registration in the Office of a mark by a false or fraudulent declaration or representation, whether oral or writing, or by any false means;

 

(k)          “Hearing Officer” means the officer within the Bureau authorized to exercise the functions of “Hearing Officer” in these Regulations.  The title or official designation of such officers may differ from the words “Hearing Officer” depending on the structure of the Office;

 

(l)          “Infringement of Copyright and Related Rights”   means any violation of the rights provided under Part IV of the IP Code and/or the applicable IP Law, including the act of any person who at the time when copyright subsists in a work has in his possession an article which he knows, or ought to know, to be an infringing copy of the work for the purpose of:  (i)  selling, letting for hire, or by way of trade offering or exposing for sale, or hire, the article;  (ii)  distributing the article for purpose of trade, or for any other purpose to an extent that will prejudice the rights of the copyright owner in the work;  or  (iii)  trade exhibit of the article in public.

 

(m)          “Infringement of Patent” means any violation of any of the rights of patentees and holders of utility model patents and industrial design registrations under Part II of the IP Code and/or the applicable IP Law, including the act of making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing a patented product or a product obtained directly or indirectly from a patented process, or the use of a patented process without the authorization of the patentee;

 

(n)          “Infringement of mark” means any violation of any of the rights of the registered owner under Part III of the IP Code and/or the applicable IP Law, including the act of any person who shall, without the consent of the owner of the registered mark, and regardless of whether there is actual sale of goods or services using the infringing material:

 

(i) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark or the same container or a dominant feature thereof in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, advertising of any goods or services including other preparatory steps necessary to carry out the sale of any goods or services on or in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; or

 

(ii) reproduce, counterfeit, copy or colorably imitate a registered mark or a dominant feature thereof and apply such reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles or advertisements intended to be used in commerce upon or in connection with the sale, offering for sale,  distribution, or advertising of goods or services or in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive;

 

(o)  “Intellectual property rights” include:

 

(i)       Copyright and Related Rights;

(ii)      Trademarks and Service Marks;

(iii)            Geographic Indications;

(iv)      Industrial Designs;

(v)              Patents;

(vi)            Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits; and

(vii)          Undisclosed Information

 

(p)          “IP Code” means Republic Act No. 8293 otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines;

 

(q)          “IP Law” means any law, in addition to the IP Code, involving intellectual property rights;

 

(r)          “Office” means the Intellectual Property Office;

 

(s)          “Regulations” means this set of rules and regulations and such Regulations as may be formulated by the Director of Bureau of Legal Affairs and approved by the Director General.

 

(t)          “Unfair Competition” means the act of any person who shall employ deception or any other means contrary to good faith by which he shall pass off the goods manufactured by him or in which he deals, or his business, or services for those of the one having established such goodwill, or who shall commit any acts calculated to produce said result.

 

The following shall likewise constitute unfair competition:

 

(i) the act of selling one’s goods and giving them the general appearance of goods of another manufacturer or dealer, either as to the goods themselves or in the wrapping of the packages in which they are contained, or the devices or words thereon, or in any other feature of their appearance, which would be likely to influence purchasers to believe that the goods offered are those of a manufacturer or dealer, or the act of clothing the goods with such appearance as shall deceive the public and defraud another of his legitimate trade, or the act of reselling the goods by any subsequent vendor with a like purpose.

 

(ii) the act of employing any other means, by artifice or device, calculated to induce the false belief that a person is offering the services of another who has identified such services in the mind of the public.

 

(iii) the act of making any false statement in the course of trade or any act contrary to good faith of a nature calculated to discredit the goods, business or services of another.

 

(u)          “Violation of laws involving intellectual property rights mentioned in Rule 2 Section 2” means violation of any law relating to the intellectual property rights enumerated under Section 4 of Republic Act No. 8293.

 

Section 2.  Interpretation – These Regulations shall be liberally construed to carry out the objectives of the IP Code and IP Laws and to assist the parties in obtaining just and expeditious settlement or disposition of administrative cases filed before the Office.

 

Section 3. Suppletory Application of the Rules of Court – These Regulations shall primarily govern in the prosecution of administrative complaints in the Bureau.  The provisions of the Rules of Court, however, shall apply in a suppletory character.

 

RULE 2

COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION

 

Section 1. Complaint, When and to Whom Filed -  All administrative complaints for violation of the IP Code or IP Laws shall be commenced by filing a verified complaint with the Bureau within four (4) years from the date of commission of the violation, or if the date be unknown, from the date of discovery of the violation.  A complaint is verified by an affidavit that the affiant has read the pleading and that the allegations therein are true and correct of his knowledge and belief.

 

A pleading required to be verified which contains a verification based on “information and belief” or upon “knowledge, information, and belief” or lacks proper verification, shall be treated as an unsigned pleading.

 

The complaint shall include a certification that the party commencing the action has not filed any other action or proceeding involving the same issue or issues before any tribunal or agency nor such action or proceeding is pending in other quasi-judicial bodies; Provided, however, that if any such action is pending, the status of the same must be stated, and should knowledge thereof be acquired after the filing of the complaint, the party concerned undertakes to notify the Bureau within five (5) days from such knowledge.  Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements shall not be curable by mere amendment of the complaint or other initiatory pleading but shall be cause for dismissal of the case without prejudice.  The submission of a false certification or non-compliance with any of the undertakings therein shall constitute indirect contempt, without prejudice to the corresponding administrative and criminal actions.  If the acts of the party or his counsel clearly constitute willful and deliberate forum shopping, the same shall be ground for summary dismissal with prejudice and shall constitute direct contempt.

 

 

Section 2.  Original Jurisdiction – (a)  The Bureau shall have original jurisdiction in administrative actions for violations of laws involving intellectual property rights where the total damages claimed are not   less   than  two   hundred  thousand  pesos  (P 200,000.00);  Provided however, that availment of the provisional remedies may be granted in accordance with these Regulations and the provisions of the Rules of Court; The Director shall coordinate with local enforcement agencies for the strict and effective implementation and enforcement of these Regulations.

 

          The commencement of the action under these Rules and Regulations is independent and without prejudice to the filing of any action with the regular courts.

 

Section 3.  Venue of Hearings. – All hearings on actions covered by these regulations shall be held within the premises of the Office. 

 

Section 4.  Formal Requirement. – The Complaint shall be typewritten and addressed to the Bureau, and shall contain the names and residences of the parties and a concise statement of the ultimate facts constituting the complainant’s cause or causes of action.  It shall specify the relief/s sought, but it may add a general prayer for such further or other relief/s as may be deemed just or equitable.  Every pleading filed shall likewise contain a caption setting forth the name of the Office and the Bureau, the title of the case, the case number, and the designation of the pleading.

 

          No pleading shall be accepted by the Bureau unless it conforms to the formal requirements provided by these Regulations and accompanied by the required filing fee.

 

Section 5.  Partners, Named Individually. – When two or more persons associated in any business, transact such business under a common name, the associates may be sued under such common name.

 

          The associates of the business who are sued under a common name may be named individually in the Answer filed by them or on their behalf with their respective postal addresses.

 

Section 6.          Payment  of  Filing  Fee  and  Docketing. -  The complaint shall be filed in triplicate with the Bureau, which shall issue an order for the payment of the required fee.

 

Upon payment of the required fee, the complainant, his counsel, or representative shall submit to the Bureau a copy of the official receipt and present the original copy thereof for comparison.  Immediately after the receipt of proof of payment of the required fee, the Records Officer or any authorized officer of the Bureau shall acknowledge receipt of the papers by assigning the Administrative Complaint Number, docket the same, and raffle the case to any of the Hearing Officers.

 

Section 7.  Representation and Confidentiality of Records. – (a)  The complaint may be prosecuted by the complainant by himself or through counsel.  The complainant and his counsel are required to conduct their business with politeness, decorum and courtesy.

 

(b)  It is strictly and absolutely forbidden for the Director, and other employees of the Office to discuss the case or any phase thereof with either counsel of record in the absence of the other or with any third person not having any interest or legal standing before the Bureau.

 

Section 8.                    Summons                   -    (a)                    Within three (3) days from receipt of the complaint, the Staff Clerk shall prepare, and the Process Server shall serve, the Summons or Notice to Answer together with a copy of the complaint to the Respondent by mail or by personal service.  If the service is done through registered mail, the return card shall be attached to the documents as evidence of receipt.  The proof of service of a summons shall be made in writing by the server and shall set forth the manner, place and date of service; shall specify any papers which have been served with the process and the name of the person who received the same; and shall be sworn to when made by a person other than a sheriff or his deputy.

 

(b)          If service cannot be made under the preceding paragraph, the office and place of residence of the party being unknown, service may be made by publication in a newspaper of general circulation, once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks and at the expense of the complainant.  When a party summoned by publication failed to appear in the action, final orders or judgments against him shall be served upon him also by publication at the expense of the prevailing party.  If the service has been made by publication, service may be proved by the affidavit of the printer, his foreman or principal clerk, or of the editor, business or advertising manager, to which affidavit a copy of the publication shall be attached, and by an affidavit showing the deposit of a copy of the summons and order for publication in the post office, postage prepaid, directed to the party by registered mail to his last known address.

 

(c)           Any application for leave to effect service by way of publication shall be made by motion in writing, supported by affidavit of the complainant or some person on his behalf, setting forth the grounds for the application.

 

(d)          When the service has been completed, the server shall within five (5) days therefrom, serve a copy of the return, personally or by registered mail, to the plaintiff’s counsel, and shall return the summons to the Hearing Officer who issued it, accompanied by proof of service.

 

 

Section 9.            Answer   -   (a) The summons shall require respondent to answer the complaint within ten (10) days from receipt thereof. The respondent shall answer the complaint in writing, by either specifically denying the material allegations of the complaint or alleging any affirmative defense.

 

If the respondent fails to answer within the time allowed therefor, the Hearing Officer shall, motu proprio or upon motion of the complainant with notice to the respondent, and proof of such failure, declare the respondent in default.  Thereupon, the Hearing Officer shall proceed to render judgment granting the complainant such relief as his pleading may warrant, unless the Hearing Officer in his discretion requires the complainant to submit evidence.  All such decisions or orders shall comply with Rule 11 of these Regulations. 

 

(b)     A party declared in default may, at any time after notice thereof and before judgment, file a motion under oath to set aside the order of default upon proper showing that his failure to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake or excusable negligence and that he has a meritorious defense.  In such a case, the order of default may be set aside on such terms and conditions as the Hearing Officer may impose in the interest of justice.

 

(c)                   A party in default shall not be entitled to notice of subsequent proceedings, unless he files a motion to lift or set aside the order of default.

 

Section 10.          Answer to Amended Complaint. – If the complaint is amended, the time fixed for the filing and service of the answer shall, unless otherwise ordered, run from the service of such amended complaint.  The original answer shall be considered as answer to the amended complaint unless a new answer is filed within ten (10) days from receipt or service of the amended complaint.

 

Section 11.            Motion to Dismiss Not Allowed. – No motion to dismiss on any of the grounds mentioned in the Rules of Court and in any other law shall be allowed except on the ground of prescription.  Such grounds other than prescription shall instead be pleaded as affirmative defenses, the resolution of which shall be made in the decision on the merits.  The Hearing Officer may, for good cause shown, conduct a preliminary hearing on any of the affirmative defenses if this will expedite the resolution of the case.

 

 

            Section 12.  Pre-trial   -   Upon joinder of issues, the pre-trial conference shall be set immediately by the Hearing Officer.  The notice of said pre-trial shall be delivered by the Process Server within three (3) days from receipt of the answer or last pleading.  The notice of pre-trial shall require the parties to submit a pre-trial brief containing the following:

 

        (a)     A brief statement of the parties’ claims and defenses;

 

        (b)    Suggestions, if any, for simplification of issues;

 

(c)          A list of documents they intend to produce as evidence, together with appropriate markings as exhibits as well as the identification of witnesses and a statement of the substance and purpose of their testimony during the hearing on the merits.  The originals of these documents must be produced for comparison during the pre-trial conference without prejudice to the presentation of additional documents during the trial if the party was prevented from producing the same during the pre-trial on account of fraud, accident, mistake, excusable negligence or such other reason which the Director or Hearing Officer deems justifiable in the interest of justice and fair play;

 

(d)         A statement whether they can stipulate on facts not covered by admissions in their pleadings.  If so, they should come up with drafts of matters they are ready to stipulate on;

 

(e)         The limitation on the number of witnesses;

 

(f)         A statement whether they are open to the possibility of an amicable settlement; and

 

          (g)         Such other matters as may aid in the prompt disposition of the action.

 

Section 13.  Effect of Failure to File Pre-Trial Brief or to Appear. – The failure of the complainant to submit the Pre-Trial Brief within the prescribed period or to appear at the pre-trial pursuant to these Regulations shall be cause for dismissal of the action with prejudice motu proprio or upon motion.  A similar failure on the part of the respondent shall be cause to declare respondent as in default motu proprio or upon motion and to allow the complainant to present his evidence ex-parte and the office to render judgment on the basis thereof.

 

Section 14.    Appearance of the Parties   -  It shall be the duty of the parties and their counsel to appear at the pre-trial.  The non-appearance of a party may be excused only if a valid cause is shown therefor or if a representative shall appear on his behalf fully authorized in writing to enter into an amicable settlement and to enter into stipulations or admissions of facts and of documents.

 

Section 15.   Effect of Failure to File Pre-trial Brief or to Appear in the Pre-trial Conference  -  The failure of the complainant to submit the Pre-trial Brief within the prescribed period or to appear at the pre-trial pursuant to these Regulations shall be cause for dismissal of the action with prejudice motu proprio or upon motion.  A similar failure on the part of the respondent shall be cause to allow the complainant to present his evidence ex-parte and the Bureau to render judgment on the basis thereof.

 

Section 16.  Record of Pre-Trial Results. – After the Pre-Trial, the Hearing Officer shall make an order which recites the action taken at the conference, the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made by the parties as to any of the matters considered.  Such order shall limit the issues for trial to those not disposed of by admissions or agreements of counsel and when entered, controls the subsequent course of the action, unless modified before trial to prevent manifest injustice.

 

Section 17.  Pre-Trial Calendar. – The Hearing Officer shall cause to be prepared a pre-trial calendar of cases for consideration as above provided.  After preparing Notice of Pre-Trial, it shall be the duty of the designated clerk of the Bureau to place such case in the pre-trial calendar.

 

RULE 3

POWERS OF HEARING OFFICERS

 

Section 1.  Powers of Hearing Officers. – (a)  A Hearing Officer conducting the hearing and investigations shall be empowered to administer oaths and affirmations; issue subpoena and subpoena duces tecum to compel attendance of parties and witnesses and the production of any book, paper, document, correspondence and other records which are material to the case;  grant provisional remedies in accordance with these Regulations and the Rules of Court; and make preliminary rulings on questions raised at the hearings, with the ultimate decision on the merits of all the issues involved being left to the Director.

 

(b)  Furthermore, a Hearing Officer as alter ego of the Director, shall have the power to cite a party or counsel or any person in contempt  in accordance with these Regulations.

 

(c)     The Hearing Officer shall likewise have the power to pass upon and approve bonds and counterbonds that may be posted by the parties; the bond or counterbond shall be in the form of cash, cashier’s or manager’s check issued in the name of the Intellectual Property Office.

 

Section 2.  Service of Subpoena.  Service of Subpoena shall be made at least three (3) calendar days before the scheduled hearing so as to allow the witness reasonable time for preparation and travel to the place of attendance.

 

Section 3. Quashing a Subpoena Duces Tecum.  The Hearing Officer, upon motion made before the time specified in a subpoena duces tecum for compliance therewith, may quash the subpoena if it is unreasonable or the relevance of the books, papers, documents, correspondence and other records does not appear, or if the person on whose behalf the subpoena is issued fails to advance the reasonable cost of the production thereof.

 

RULE 4

PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT

 

Section 1.  Grounds Upon Which Attachment May Issue. – At the commencement of the action or at any time before entry of judgment, a complainant or any proper party may have the property of the adverse party attached as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that may be recovered in the following cases:

 

(a)          In an action against a party who has been guilty of fraud in procuring the registration of a mark in the Office by false or fraudulent declaration or representation, whether oral or in writing, or by any false means;

 

(b)          In an action against a party who has employed deception or any other means contrary to good faith by which he shall pass off the goods manufactured by him or in which he deals or his business or services for those of the one having established such  goodwill,   or   who   shall commit any act calculated to produce said result whether or not a mark is involved;

 

(c)          In an action against a party who does not reside and is not found in the Philippines, or on whom summons may be served by publication;

 

(d)          In an action for the recovery of a specified amount of money or damages on a cause of action arising from a violation of the IP Code against a party who is about to depart from the Philippines with intent to evade the execution of judgment; or

 

(e)          In an action against a party who has removed or disposed of his property, or is about to do so, with intent to defraud the aggrieved party.

 

Section 2.  Issuance and Contents of Order. – An order of attachment may be issued either ex-parte or upon motion with notice and hearing conducted by the Hearing Officer.  The Hearing Officer shall determine whether the attachment sought is meritorious or not.  Should an order of attachment be issued by the Hearing Officer, he shall sign and forward the order to the Director who shall direct, without delay, the officer or such other designated employee of the Bureau to attach so much of the property in the Philippines of the party against whom it is issued, not exempt from execution, as may be sufficient to satisfy the applicant’s demand, unless such party makes deposit or gives a bond as hereinafter provided in an amount equal to that fixed in the order, which may be the amount sufficient to satisfy the applicant’s demand or the value of the property to be attached as stated by the applicant, exclusive of costs.

 

Section 3.  Affidavit and Bond Required. – An order of attachment shall be granted only when it appears by the affidavit of the applicant, or of some other person who personally knows the facts, that a sufficient cause of action exists, that the case is one of those mentioned in Section 1 hereof, that there is no other sufficient security for the claim sought to be enforced by the action, and that the amount due to the applicant, or the value of the property the possession of which he is entitled to recover, is as much as the sum for which the order is granted above all legal counterclaims.  The affidavit and the receipt evidencing payment of the bond must be duly filed with the Hearing Officer and forwarded to the Office of the Director before the order issues.

 

Section 4.  Condition of Applicant’s Bond – The party applying for the order must   give a bond executed to the adverse party in the amount fixed by the Hearing Officer in his order granting the issuance of the writ, conditioned that the applicant will pay all the costs which may be adjudged to the adverse party and all damages which he may sustain by reason of the attachment, if the Hearing Officer shall finally adjudge that the applicant was not entitled thereto.

 

Section 5.  Manner of Attaching Property. – The officer enforcing the writ shall, without delay and with all reasonable diligence, attach, to await judgment and execution in the action, only so much of the property in the Philippines of the party against whom the writ is issued, not exempt from execution, as may be sufficient to satisfy the applicant’s demand, unless the former files a counterbond, in an amount equal to the bond fixed by the Hearing Officer in the order of attachment or to the value of the property to be attached, exclusive of costs.  No levy on attachment pursuant to the writ shall be enforced unless it is preceded, or accompanied by service of summons, together with a copy of the complaint, the application for attachment, the applicant’s affidavit and bond, and the order and writ of attachment on the defendant within the Philippines.

         

The requirement of prior or contemporaneous service of summons shall not apply where the summons could not be served personally or by substituted service despite diligent efforts, or the defendant is a resident of the Philippines temporarily absent therefrom, or the defendant is a non-resident of the Philippines.

 

Section 6.  Sheriff’s Return. – (a)  After enforcing the writ, the sheriff must likewise, without delay, make a return thereon to the Hearing Officer from whom the writ issued, with a full statement of his proceedings under the writ and a complete inventory of the property attached, together with any counterbond given by the party against whom attachment is issued, and serve copies thereof on the applicant.

 

(b)       The sheriff shall submit a report to the Hearing Officer on the action taken on all writs and processes assigned to them within twenty (20) days from receipt of said process or writ.  Said report shall form part of the records of the case.

 

(c)       At the end of every month, said Hearing Officer shall submit a report to the Director indicating therein the number of writs and processes issued and served, as well as the number of writs and processes unserved during the month and the names of the sheriffs who executed each writ.  Unserved writs and processes shall be explained in the report.

 

          Section 7.  What May be the Subject of Attachment and the Manner of Executing the Same. – The following properties may be the subject of attachment:

 

(a)          Real Properties – Real properties, or the machineries that may be found inside the premises belonging to the party against whom the writ is issued, or any interest therein, by filing with the Registry of Deeds a copy of the order, together with a description of the property attached, and a notice that it is attached, and by leaving a copy of such order, description, and notice with the occupant of the property, if any, or with such other person or his agent if found within the city or province where the property is located.  The Registrar of Deeds must index attachments filed under this section in the name of the applicant, the adverse party, or the person by whom the property is held or in whose name it stands in the records.  If the attachment is not claimed on the entire area of the land covered by the certificate of title, a description sufficiently accurate for the identification of the land or interest to be affected shall be included in the registration of such attachment.

 

(b)          Personal Properties. – Those personal properties capable of manual delivery, by taking such properties after issuing the corresponding receipt therefore.  The sheriff shall thereafter deliver the attached properties to the complainant or proper party who shall be responsible for the custody, safekeeping, preservation, and the inventory and return of said properties to the other party or proper party upon termination of the case.

 

(c)          Shares of Stocks – Shares of stocks or an interest in  shares of stocks of any corporation or company, by leaving with the president or managing agent thereof ,a copy of the writ, and a notice stating that the stock or interest of the party against whom the attachment is issued is attached in pursuance of such writ.

 

Section 8.  When Attached Property May Be Sold After Levy on Attachment and Before Entry of Judgment. – Whenever it shall be made to appear to the Hearing Officer, upon hearing with notice to both parties, that the property attached is perishable, or that the interests of all the parties to the action will be subserved by the sale thereof, the Hearing Officer may order such property to be sold at public auction in such manner as he may direct, and the proceeds of such sale to be deposited as the Director may prescribe to await the judgment in the action.

 

Section 9.  Discharge of Attachment Upon Giving Counterbond. – After a writ of attachment has been enforced, the party whose property has been attached, or the person appearing on his behalf, may move for the discharge of the attachment wholly or in part on the security given.  The Hearing Officer shall, after due notice and hearing, order the discharge of the attachment if the movant makes a cash deposit, or files a counterbond with the Office of the Director in an amount equal to that fixed by the Hearing Officer in the order of attachment, exclusive of costs.  But if the attachment sought to be discharged is with respect to a particular property, the counterbond shall be equal to the value of that property as determined by the Hearing Officer.  The cash deposit or the counterbond shall secure the payment of any judgment that the attaching party may recover in the action.  A notice of the deposit shall forthwith be served on the attaching party.  Upon the discharge of an attachment in accordance with the provisions of this section, the property attached, or the proceeds of any sale thereof, shall be delivered to the party making the deposit or filing the counterbond, or to the person appearing on his behalf, the deposit or counterbond aforesaid standing in place of the property so released.  Should such counterbond for any reason be found to be or become insufficient, and the party furnishing the same fails to file an additional counterbond, the attaching party may apply for a new order of attachment.

 

Section 10.  Discharge of Attachment on Other Grounds  - The party whose property has been ordered attached may file a motion with the Hearing Officer before whom the case is pending, before or after levy or even after release of the attached property, for an order to set aside or discharge the attachment on the ground that the same was improperly or irregularly issued or enforced, or that the bond is insufficient, or that the property being attached is exempt from execution.  If the attachment is excessive, the discharge shall be limited to the excess.  If said motion be made on an affidavit, the attaching party may oppose the same by a counter-affidavit or other evidence in addition to that on which the attachment was made.  After due notice and hearing, the Hearing Officer shall order the setting aside or the discharge of the attachment if it appears that it was improperly or irregularly issued or enforced, or that the bond is insufficient, or that the attachment is excessive, and the defect is not cured forthwith, or the property being attached is exempt from execution.

 

Section 11.  When the Property Attached is Claimed by Third Person. – If the property attached is claimed by a person not a party to the proceeding, and such person makes an affidavit of his title thereto, or right to the possession thereof, and serves such affidavit upon the sheriff and a copy thereof upon the attaching party, the sheriff shall not be bound to keep the property under attachment unless the attaching party or his agent, on demand of the sheriff shall file a bond approved by the Hearing Officer to indemnify the third party claimant in a sum not less than the value of the property levied upon.  In case of disagreement as to such value, the same shall be decided by the Director.  No claim for damages for the taking or keeping of the property may be enforced against the bond unless the action therefor is filed within sixty (60) days from the date of the filing of the bond.

 

          The sheriff shall not be liable for damages for the taking or keeping of such property, to any such third party claimant, if such bond shall be filed.  Nothing herein contained shall prevent such claimant or any third person from vindicating his claim to the property, or prevent the attaching party from claiming damages against a third party claimant who filed a frivolous or plainly spurious claim, in the same or in a separate action.

 

Section 12.  Satisfaction of Judgment out of Property Attached; Sheriff’s Return. – If judgment be recovered by the attaching party and execution issue thereon, the sheriff may cause the judgment to be satisfied out of the property attached, if it be sufficient for that purpose in the following manner:

 

(a)          By paying to the judgment obligee the proceeds of all sales of perishable or other property sold in pursuance of the order of the Bureau, or so much as shall be necessary to satisfy the judgment;

 

(b)          If any balance remains due, by selling so much of the property, real or personal, as may be necessary to satisfy the balance, if enough property remain in the sheriff’s hands for that purpose, or in those of the Office of the Director.

 

The sheriff shall forthwith make a return to the Hearing Officer of his proceedings under this Section and furnish the parties with copies thereof.

 

Section 13.  Balance Due Collected Upon an Execution; Excess Delivered to Judgment Obligor. – If after realizing upon all the property attached, and applying the proceeds to the satisfaction of the judgment, less the expenses of proceedings upon the judgment, any balance shall remain due, the sheriff must proceed to collect such balance as upon ordinary execution.  Whenever the judgment shall have been paid, the sheriff, upon reasonable demand, must return to the judgment obligor the attached property remaining in his hands, and any proceeds of the sale of the property attached not applied to the judgment.

 

Section 14.  Disposition of Money Deposited   -   Where the party against whom attachment had been issued has deposited money, it shall be applied under the direction of the Director to the satisfaction of any judgment rendered in favor of the attaching party, and after satisfying the judgment the balance shall be refunded to the depositor or his assignee.  If the judgment is in favor of the party against whom attachment was issued, the whole sum deposited must be refunded to him or his assignee.

 

Section 15.  Disposition of Attached Property Where Judgment is for Party Against Whom Attachment was Issued. – If judgment be rendered against the attaching party, all the proceeds of sales and money collected or received by the sheriff, under the order of attachment and all property attached remaining in such officer’s hands, shall be delivered to the party against whom attachment was issued, and the order of attachment discharged.

 

Section 16.  Claim for Damages on Account of Improper, Irregular or Excessive Attachment. – An application for damages on account of improper, irregular or excessive attachment must be filed with the Director before the trial or before appeal is perfected or before the judgment becomes executory, with due notice to the attaching party, setting forth the facts showing his right to damages and the amount thereof.  Such damages may be awarded only after proper hearing and shall be included in the judgment on the main case.

 

          If, on appeal, the judgment of the Director-General be favorable to the party against whom the attachment was issued, the latter may claim damages sustained during the pendency of the appeal by filing an application in the Office of the Director-General, with notice to the party in whose favor the attachment was issued, before the judgment of the Director-General becomes executory.  The Director-General may remand the application to the Bureau for hearing and decision.

 

          Nothing herein contained shall prevent the party against whom the attachment was issued from recovering in the same action the damages awarded to him from any property of the attaching party not exempt from execution should the bond or deposit given by the latter be insufficient or fail to fully satisfy the award.

 

RULE 5

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

 

Section 1.  Preliminary injunction defined; who may grant. - preliminary injunction is an order granted at any stage of an action or proceeding prior to the judgment or final order, requiring a party to an administrative case or any third person to refrain from a particular act or acts.  It may also require the performance of a particular act or acts, in which case it shall be known as a preliminary mandatory injunction.

 

A preliminary injunction may be granted by the Hearing Officer who is hearing the case but no such power can be exercised as against a concurrent court or other Office which has already acquired jurisdiction over the subject matter.

 

Section 2.  Grounds for Issuance of Preliminary Injunction. – A preliminary injunction may be granted when it is established: